babatoma: (Default)
Довольно хорошо аргументированно написанный материал.

Ба-бам!
Джаред Кушнер, зять Трампа и его советник, просил российского посла Кисляка установить секретный канал связи между переходной командой Трампа и Кремлем. Об этом посол Кисляк доложил начальству в Москве в начале декабря. Его доклад перехватила американская разведка и теперь об этом пишет Вашингтон Пост.

Ба-ба-ба-бам!
Олег Дерипаска предложил дать показания перед Конгрессом в обмен на иммунитет. Дерипаска работал с Полом Манафортом, возглавлявшим предвыборную кампанию Трампа. Манафорта изучает ФБР на предмет тайного сговора кампании Трампа и/или отдельных ее членов с Кремлем во время выборов.
От щедрого предложения Дерипаски Конгресс отказался из-за опасения, что иммунитет создаст сложности для федеральных криминальных следователей. Об этом пишет Нью-Йорк Таймс.

Кстати, генерал Майкл Флинн, уволенный с поста советника по национальной безопасности после скандала, тоже предлагал свои показания Конгрессу в обмен на иммунитет и тоже получил отказ. Теперь уже Флинн отказывается предоставлять какие-либо документы по требованию Конгресса, ссылаясь на 5-ю поправку.
Да, и еще американская разведка, как выяснилось на днях, узнала, что двое кремлевских чиновников хвастались тем, что Флинн их ценный актив в окружении Трампа и он сможет быть полезен для Кремля.

И эти новости идут с разницей в час.

Ну и главное - после Memorial Day показания в Конгрессе даст уволенный Трампом глава ФБР Джеймс Коми.
Если на слушаниях он подтвердит подлинность своих заметок, сделанных им после встречи с Трампом о том, что президент просил его прекратить расследование против Флинна, то это будет означать, что 45-му президенту США можно объявить импичмент за воспрепятствование правосудию. А это тяжкое преступление.

А вкупе с последними новостями, получается, что расследовать есть что.

Да, и последнее. Джаред Кушнер ко всему прочему имеет прямые связи с Романом Абрамовичем через движение Шабат в Порте Вашингтон, в Нью-Йорке. Как писала Politico, через Абрамовича Кремль закачивал в эту организацию нехилые деньги.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/…/520a14b4-422d-11e7-9869-ba…

Карина Орлова.

babatoma: (Default)
лошадь Лаврова, циник и путинский прихлебатель, Кисляк хитрожопенький  стукач, и ТАСС уполномочен заявить. ну и до кучи старый маразматик Киссинджер, путинский пудель.
Вопросы есть о связи идиота с РФ? Вопросов нет!
Звучат голоса,что, мол, путин обыграл демократию в США. Ни хрена он не обыграл, а дебила-трампа обыграть в дурака сможет и детсадовский ребенок. На раз-два.
Хотелось бы посмотреть в незамутненные разумом глаза обожателеей трампа и послушать  Топаллера, который последнюю тельняшку рвал на себе за трампа, вылив на Хиллари вагон грязи. Дрянь-человек и имя ему-подонок.

babatoma: (Default)

Для поклонников трампа. 100 моментов явной лжи.
 Материал довольно большой и на английском,но там все понятно.

The First 100 Lies: The Trump Team’s Flurry Of Falsehoods

The president and his aides succeeded in reaching the mark in just 36 days.

Illustration: HuffPost Photos: Getty

To say that President Donald Trump has a casual relationship with the truth would be a gross understatement. He has repeatedly cited debunked conspiracy theories, pushed voter fraud myths, and embellished his record and accomplishments. The barrage of falsehoods has been so furious that journalists have taken to issuing instant fact-checks during press conferences and calling out false statements during cable news broadcasts.

All presidents lie, but lying so brazenly and so frequently about even silly factoids like his golf game has put Trump in his own category. His disregard for the truth is reflected in his top aides, who have inflated easily disproved figures like the attendance at his inauguration and even cited terror attacks that never happened.

The Huffington Post tracked the public remarks of Trump and his aides to compile a list of 100 incidents of egregious falsehoods. Still, it is likely the administration has made dozens of other misleading and exaggerated claims.

  1. White House press secretary Sean Spicer falsely claimed the crowd on the National Mall was “largest audience to ever witness an inauguration.” (Jan. 21)

  2. Trump falsely claimed that the crowd for his swearing-in stretched down the National Mall to the Washington Monument and totaled more than 1 million people. (Jan. 21)

  3. As Trump fondly recalled his Inauguration Day, he said it stopped raining “immediately” when he began his speech. A light rain continued to fall throughout the address. (Jan. 21)

    и продолжение:

www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-administration-lies-100_us_58ac7a0fe4b02a1e7dac3ca6


babatoma: (Default)

With National Security Council Shakeup, Steve Bannon Gets A Seat At The Table

 

Stephen "Steve" Bannon, chief strategist for U.S. President Donald Trump, arrives to a swearing in ceremony of White House senior staff in the East Room of the White House on Sunday, Jan. 22.

Andrew Harrer /Bloomberg via Getty Images

President Trump has reorganized the National Security Council by elevating his chief strategist Steve Bannon and demoting the Director of National Intelligence and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Now, Bannon will join the NSC's principals committee, the top inter-agency group for discussing national security. The National Security Council is the staff inside the White House that coordinates decision making by the president on such matters, in coordination with outside departments including the State Department and the Pentagon.

It's an unusual decision, NPR's Mara Liasson reported. "David Axelrod, for instance, who had a similar job as Bannon in the Obama administration, never sat in on Principals meetings," she added. When such figures seen as part of the political wing of the White House have participated in broader National Security Council meetings, it's sparked sharp criticism from the national security establishment.

Before joining Donald Trump's inner circle during the 2016 campaign, Bannon was the head of Breitbart News, a far-right media outlet that has promoted conspiracy theories and is a platform for the alt-right movement, which espouses white nationalism.

Bannon was extremely influential during the first week of the administration – he is said to be part of a small group inside the White House driving the flurry of executive actions this week, Mara Liasson has reported.

Some of those orders have provoked criticism that Bannon and other administration officials are not coordinating with other agencies on major policy changes, Mara says, such as the chaos and detentions at airports following Trump's executive order on immigration.

 

Steve Bannon, right, joins President Trump and national security advisor Michael Flynn in the Oval Office on Saturday during a call with Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull.

Pete Marovich/Bloomberg via Getty Images

The NSC principals committee is defined as "the Cabinet-level senior interagency forum for considering policy issues that affect the national security interests of the United States." It's chaired either by national security advisor Michael Flynn or homeland security advisor Tom Bossert and now includes the secretaries of state, defense and the Treasury, plus the attorney general, White House chief of staff and the president's chief strategist, which is Bannon's position.

On the other hand, the Director of National Intelligence and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff will now attend Principals Committees meetings only when "issues pertaining to their responsibilities and expertise are to be discussed," according to the presidential memorandum issued on Saturday.

As NPR national security editor Philip Ewing explains, Trump "is shaking up the wonky process by which the executive branch makes its toughest decisions on national security – the big question is how much that will matter." Here's more:

"On paper, these are big changes: Past administrations ran their National Security Councils with a Great Wall of China-separation between the political team at the White House and the nonpartisan specialists who help with decision-making. The explicit inclusion of Bannon means that Trump's top adviser on messaging, strategy and other partisan issues means he could also be part of decisions about policy toward adversaries, military actions and other such decisions.

"What does it all mean, in practical terms? It's too soon to say. Former national security council staffers say their day-to-day meetings and process were not governed by whatever formal instruction issued by their respective presidents. Political staffers from the White House have attended meetings in the past. The committees invite who they think they need to invite given the topics under discussion – something that will likely continue under [National Security Advisor Michael] Flynn."

Top security officials from the Obama administration are blasting the decision.

Former Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who served under Obama and George W. Bush, called the demotions a "big mistake" in an interview with ABC News. " I think that they both bring a perspective and judgment and experience to bear that every president, whether they like it or not, finds useful," Gates said.

Former National Security Advisor Susan Rice called the move "stone cold crazy." In a sarcastic tweet, she said: "Who needs military advice or intel to make policy on ISIL, Syria, Afghanistan, DPRK?"

White House press secretary Sean Spicer responded in an interview with ABC News. "That's clearly inappropriate language from a former ambassador," Spicer said. "We are instilling reforms to make sure that we streamline the process for the president to make decisions on key, important intelligence matters. You've got a leader in General Flynn who understands the intelligence process and the reforms that are needed probably better than anybody else."

Spicer also defended Bannon's qualifications. "Well, he is a former naval officer. He's got a tremendous understanding of the world and the geopolitical landscape that we have now," Spicer said.

Sen. John McCain, chairman of the Armed Services Committee, told CBS News, "I am worried about the National Security Council. Who are the members of it and who are the permanent members? The appointment of Mr. Bannon is something which a radical departure from any National Security Council in history."

McCain added that, "One person who is indispensable would be the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in my view."

П.С. Какие мерзкие рожи пришли к власти. !

Page generated Jun. 22nd, 2017 11:58 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios